
So I’m resting this morning. My fibro pain has been so bad lately. My ribcage is so swollen. Tender to the touch. I already made one QVC purchase and figured better get on my blog before I did anything I’d seriously regret!
I’ve been thinking about teen literature lately. First off, is it just me or did this genre invent itself in the last 10 years? I can’ think of a single series that was popular when I was in high school 94-98. I can think of things like Baby Sitters Club, Sweet Valley High or even RL Stine which was popular when I was in middle school but nothing in high school. The only books I remember reading in high school were the one’s assigned to me at school. I remember liking Arthur Miller plays, Silas Marner, Shakespeare (especially the sonnets) and To Kill a Mockingbird. Those were all books I read during school.
Surely I must have read something during summer break but I can’t think of anything? What are the 90’s teen lit books I’m forgetting? I didn’t really become excited about reading until college and then I veraciously ate up Jane Austen, Harry Potter, and other books. I read the 4 major Jane Austen books (Sense and Sensibility, Pride and Prejudice, Persuasion and Emma) in a 6 week break I had in the winter of 99.
So, that’s my first thought. Second, I wonder how helpful the teen lit genre is for actual teens. Here are a few concerns.
1. Even the best teen lit books, Harry Potter, Lightning Thief, Hunger Games, all portray characters who basically act like adults and are required to make adult decisions. I like these books so quiet down but don’t you think this is true? In the Twilight books Bella basically has to decide by the time she is 18 what she wants to do with her life in immortality.
A few weeks ago I saw a sign at the library saying “Teens: Do You Hate Cupid? Are you down on Love?”. I seem to be alone in finding this sign amazing. Should teens really be worried about love, let alone be down on it? If you think about Twilight and Harry Potter and Hunger Games all of the major female characters basically have to decide on their true loves as teenagers. Plus, they all have to save their families, and in Harry’s case the whole world from ultimate evil.
Shouldn’t teens just be worried about getting a date to prom or learning to drive? I have 2 teenage siblings and I think there is a lot of pressure on them to ‘succeed’ and to already know who you are. I didn’t figure that out until college. (It also doesn’t help that most teens are played by 30 year olds- ie Glee).
If you look at something from my generation for teens- Clueless. Obviously the wealth and characters are over the top for comedy-sake but at the core its about making friends, fashion, crushes, learning to drive, dealing with teachers, parents and cliques, and trying to mature. Even at the end Cher doesn’t fall in love for all time. She says ” I am only 16, and this is California, not Kentucky.” (I love that movie btw)
2. All of the books mentioned above feature characters that have a specific magical destiny. Most of us just lead normal lives. I think there is a lot of pressure to live some amazing dream life. Then when you don’t know what you want to do or aren’t supremely talented at something you feel depressed.
Not all of us can be Michael Phelps and have a solo vision in life. I think in the past the vision of teens was to have a family, live in nice house and be happy. Now you have to do something impactful or at least be famous.
Teen movies show this. I recently watched the movie Monte Carlo with teen queen Selena Gomez. In the movie the Gomez character graduates from high school and goes to visit Paris with her 2 sisters. The first 25 minutes are actually pretty good with a teen trying to get along with her 2 sisters and adjust post-high school while experiencing a new country. Then they have to go make her switch identities with a socialite who looks just like her and live as this queen, pop star for the rest of the movie. You see what I mean? Just being a normal teen isn’t good enough. She had to be famous, amazing, rich, noticed to be happy.
3. Most of these teen books are amazingly dark. I think of Judy Blume, a teen lit of my era, her books trite as they might be involved teens and dealing with friendship, family, school troubles, parental divorce, girls dealing with their periods, and other real teen concerns. Regardless, there is a lightness to her books that is appealing.
The Hunger Games is especially dark with brutal, violent, children-on-children combat. Compellingly written as it may be, shouldn’t we a bit concerned that all this darkness is going to lead to dark, brooding teens? A teen I know just said ‘I am depressed’. With all this reading I don’t blame her!
I was not a big fan of Stargirl by Jerry Spinelli but at least it was light, positive and fun. My friend and I were talking and agreed even the Goose Girl series by Shannon Hale is pretty dark.
I know you can make the argument that all fairy tales are dark but usually those were stories, not huge books (let alone series), and there was always a happy ending at the end. Hunger Games didn’t even really give you that.
It’s like I said to my friend Forest Hartman on his review of Monte Carlo
“I don’t understand movies like Monte Carlo. Isn’t it enough of an adventure for a girl to go to Europe without her having to become a star at the same time? It sounds just like the dreaded Lizzie Mcguire movie of years ago that my little sister begged me to take her to.
I think you could make a very good movie about a teen experiencing Paris or Monte Carlo and maturing through art, music, fashion. Would that script be so much harder to write or so much less marketable? I dont think so”
He said:
“I think there’s also a lot of pressure on screenwriters to turn out formulaic material. Something inventive is often seen as risky and many producers are afraid to take risks. It’s simpler to take a star and put them in a rehashing of something that’s already been done because the project is seen as safe. Of course, that’s not always true because most Hollywood films lose money at the box office.”
Isn’t it funny that what is seen as inventive is a story about a normal girl, experiencing normal things? Ever since Harry Potter everyone has been trying to be the next Harry Potter. I get that.
How about we make the next big thing- the anti- Harry Potter? Maybe I will just have to write a book about the kind of teen I was. I’ve never read a book like that. Hmmmm
Anyway, I must admit at the end of this that I am not a huge fantasy fan, never have been, so maybe I am biased to begin with but what do you think of my 3 points on teen lit? I’m sure my sister will have something to say because she is much more well read in the genre than I am.
Finally, can we agree no more books on werewolves or vampires? I was looking at audible teen and it seemed like every book was about one or the other.